Mrs. Anna Elizabetha WEYER was born about 1649 in Of Urbach, Rhineland, N.J.. She has reference number HL8G-V0.

Spouse: Johannes Wilhelm WEYER. Children were: Nicolas WEYER, Dorothea Maria WEYER, Herbert WEYER, Johannes Georg WEYER, Johannes Peter WEYER.


Nicolas WEYER was born about 1676 in Of Urbach, Rhineland, N.J.. He has reference number HL8G-W5. Parents: Johannes Wilhelm WEYER and Mrs. Anna Elizabetha WEYER.


[Baroness Burghe Cicely De WEYLAND15,16,1128,1129 was born about 1320 in Blaxhall, England. She died before 1365 at the age of 45. She was buried before August 1366. Name Suffix:<NSFX> [Baroness Burghe
Name Suffix:<NSFX> [BARONESS BURGHE
Ancestral File Number:<AFN> 9GZ2-5D Parents: .

Spouse: [Baron Burghersh Bartholomew De BURGHERSH. [Baroness Burghe Cicely De WEYLAND and [Baron Burghersh Bartholomew De BURGHERSH were married before 11 May 1335.16 Children were: [Baroness Despen Elizabeth BURGHERSH.


Edmund Philemon WHALE[xUpline] (private).

Spouse: Elizabeth FROST.


Anne WHALESBOROUGH[xUpline] (private).

Spouse: William DE MOLEYNS Baron. Children were: Eleanor DE MOLEYNS Baroness.


Anne WHALESBOROUGH598,599 was born about 1395 in Whalesbrough, Cornwall, England. She died in 1467 at the age of 72 in London, England. 1 _UID 2C6F460ECF69D04282CD3765C9A575ADB40C Parents: John WHALESBOROUGH and Joan RALEIGH.

Spouse: William DE MOLINES. 1 _UID 8EC2832D78A6BD4CB8B4F4B27F5C12D6FC69Children were: Eleanor MOLINES, Sir William MOLEYNS, Anne MOLYNES.

Spouse: Sir John DE HAMPTON. 1 _UID 8CA302F1941B1541A468FA0ADC207132D6C4Children were: Thomas DE HAMPTON, Anne HAMPTON, Eleanor HAMPTON.


Elizabeth WHALESBOROUGH was born in 1406 in Whalesborough, Cornwall, England.

Spouse: John HAMPDEN. Children were: Thomas HAMPDEN.


John WHALESBOROUGH598,599 was born about 1355 in of Cornwall, England. 1 _UID 2546DB4701DAD541A081C30C5E0A2A8181C4 Parents: .

Spouse: Joan RALEIGH. 1 _UID 53EF286B30811848A0DEBD46B72BCDDAF0C2Children were: Anne WHALESBOROUGH.


Gilbert WHALEY[xUpline] (private). Parents: Thomas WHALEY and Elizabeth STRELLEY.


Henry WHALEY was born about 1410 in Lancaster County, England. Parents: .

Spouse: Dorothy WILLOUGHBY. Dorothy WILLOUGHBY and Henry WHALEY were married in England. Children were: Richard WHALEY.


John WHALEY[xUpline] (private). Parents: Thomas WHALEY and Elizabeth HATFIELD.


Richard WHALEY was born about 1440 in Lancaster Co, England. He was in Sheriff of Nottingham. Parents: Henry WHALEY and Dorothy WILLOUGHBY.

Spouse: Elizabeth LEAKE. Elizabeth LEAKE and Richard WHALEY were married in Kirkston, England. Children were: Thomas WHALEY.


Richard WHALEY was born about 1499 in Doralston, Strafford County, England.1618 He died on 23 November 1583 at the age of 84 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. He was in member of parliament for Scarborough 1547-53. Richard was educated in Knight of the Shire Nottingham Co. Richard had three wives and 25 children. His first wife was Laura Brookman, who had five children. His second wife was Ursala Thwaites, who had thirteen children. His third wife was Barbara Cope who had seven children. A prominent adherent of Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset, and a member of parliament. (Wikipedia) Parents: Thomas WHALEY and Elizabeth STRELLEY.

Spouse: Ursala THWAITES.

Spouse: Barbara COPE.

Spouse: Laura BROOKMAN. Laura BROOKMAN and Richard WHALEY were married about 1534 in Screveton, England. Children were: Thomas WHALEY.


Thomas WHALEY[xUpline] (private). Parents: Thomas WHALEY and Elizabeth STRELLEY.


Thomas WHALEY[xUpline] (private). Parents: Thomas WHALEY and Elizabeth HATFIELD.


Thomas WHALEY was born about 1455 in Doralston, Strafford County, England. About 1472 in Kirkston, Nottingham, England. Of Kirkton Hall Parents: Richard WHALEY and Elizabeth LEAKE.

Spouse: Elizabeth STRELLEY. Children were: Gilbert WHALEY, Thomas WHALEY, Richard WHALEY.


Thomas WHALEY was born about 1535 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. He died in 1582 at the age of 47. Parents: Richard WHALEY and Laura BROOKMAN.

Spouse: Elizabeth HATFIELD. Children were: Waller WHALEY, Thomas WHALEY, John WHALEY, Richard WHALLEY.


Waller WHALEY[xUpline] (private). Parents: Thomas WHALEY and Elizabeth HATFIELD.


*Jane WHALLEY was born in 1611 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. William Hooke, a distinguished Puritan clergyman, was born in 1601, in Southampton and died in London, March 21, 1678. His remains rest in Bunhill Fields, London. He bore the same Arms with slight variations to those of the Bramshott family. He married Jane Whalley, sister of one of the Regicide Judges who sentenced Charles I to death. Her mother was Frances Cromwell, aunt of the Protector.
After graduating from Trinity College, Oxford, he went to New England in 1640, founded a church at Taunton, Massachusetts, and later (1644) moved to New Haven, Connecticut, where for twelve years he assisted John Davenport, founder of the City, in his work in the first Congregational Church. Here he remained until 1656 when he and his son John, who had recently graduated from Harvard College, followed the wife and mother who had gone to England in 1654. At the command of Oliver Cromwell he became his private Chaplain and Master of the Savoy Hospital until the close of the Commonwealth.

His son, John, born 1634, died 1710, was minister at Basingstoke.
A tablet to the memory of William Hooke may be seen in Center Church, New Haven, and literature of that church says that the property known as "Hooke's Lot" at the corner of College and Chapel Streets, New Haven, which Rev. William Hooke gave to the church upon his departure, when offered for sale to the Trustees of the Collegiate School in 1717, was the inducement which caused Yale University to locate in New Haven rather than Wethersfield or Saybrook.
A very interesting thing brought out by the record of this family of Southampton is the fact that it espoused the Cromwellian cause, also that it drew away from the Church of England
and became Puritan in belief. Other records indicate that the family was divided during that trying period (see "Rural Life in Hampshire" by W. W. Capes), but it is possible that this served to protect both sides when either was out of sympathy with the government in power. This was proved in one case where one branch of the family interceded with Parliament for rights that had been withdrawn from another branch.
(James Hook and Virginia Eller, page 35) Parents: Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


*Jane WHALLEY was born in 1611 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. William Hooke, a distinguished Puritan clergyman, was born in 1601, in Southampton and died in London, March 21, 1678. His remains rest in Bunhill Fields, London. He bore the same Arms with slight variations to those of the Bramshott family. He married Jane Whalley, sister of one of the Regicide Judges who sentenced Charles I to death. Her mother was Frances Cromwell, aunt of the Protector.
After graduating from Trinity College, Oxford, he went to New England in 1640, founded a church at Taunton, Massachusetts, and later (1644) moved to New Haven, Connecticut, where for twelve years he assisted John Davenport, founder of the City, in his work in the first Congregational Church. Here he remained until 1656 when he and his son John, who had recently graduated from Harvard College, followed the wife and mother who had gone to England in 1654. At the command of Oliver Cromwell he became his private Chaplain and Master of the Savoy Hospital until the close of the Commonwealth.

His son, John, born 1634, died 1710, was minister at Basingstoke.
A tablet to the memory of William Hooke may be seen in Center Church, New Haven, and literature of that church says that the property known as "Hooke's Lot" at the corner of College and Chapel Streets, New Haven, which Rev. William Hooke gave to the church upon his departure, when offered for sale to the Trustees of the Collegiate School in 1717, was the inducement which caused Yale University to locate in New Haven rather than Wethersfield or Saybrook.
A very interesting thing brought out by the record of this family of Southampton is the fact that it espoused the Cromwellian cause, also that it drew away from the Church of England
and became Puritan in belief. Other records indicate that the family was divided during that trying period (see "Rural Life in Hampshire" by W. W. Capes), but it is possible that this served to protect both sides when either was out of sympathy with the government in power. This was proved in one case where one branch of the family interceded with Parliament for rights that had been withdrawn from another branch.
(James Hook and Virginia Eller, page 35) Parents: *Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


*Richard WHALLEY was born about 1569 in Kirkston, Nottinghamshire, England. Between 1595 and 1596 he was in Sheriff of Nottinghamshire.1618 In 1602 he was in Member of Parliament for Boroughbridge. *Richard was also known as Richard Whaley. or 1585
or in Hinchingbrooke, Huntingdon, England Parents: .

Spouse: Frances CROMWELL. 12 Jul 1595?Children were: Thomas WHALLEY, *Jane WHALLEY, Elizabeth WHALLEY, Edward WHALLEY, Robert Theophilus WHALLEY, Henry WHALLEY.


Edward WHALLEY was born about 1615 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England.1618 He died after 1674 at the age of 59 in Hadley, MA.4644 He was in woollen-draper, major of Cromwell's regiment of horse. 18 Jan 1668 ?
Edward Whalley is said to have started out as a woollen-draper, but on the outbreak of the English Civil War he took up arms for Parliament, became major of Cromwell's regiment of horse, and distinguished himself in the field. His conduct at Gainsborough in 1643 was especially praised by Cromwell; he fought at the Battle of Marston Moor, commanded one of Cromwell's two regiments of cavalry at the Battle of Naseby and at the capture of Bristol, was then sent into Oxfordshire, took Banbury, and was besieging Worcester when he was superseded, according to Richard Baxter, the chaplain of his regiment, because of his religious orthodoxy. The following year, he took part in Cromwell's pursuit of Charles II and took part in the Battle of Worcester. He followed and supported Cromwell in his political career, presented the army petition to parliament (August 1652), approved of the protectorate, and represented Nottinghamshire in the parliaments of 1654 and 1656, taking an active part in the prosecution of the Quaker James Naylor. He was one of the administrative major-generals, responsible for Lincoln, Nottingham, Derby, Warwick and Leicester. He supported the "Petition and Advice," except as regards the proposed assumption of the royal title by Cromwell, and became a member of the newly constituted House of Lords in December 1657. On Cromwell's death, at which he was present, he in vain gave his support to Richard Cromwell; his regiment refused to obey his orders, and the Long Parliament dismissed him from his command as a representative of the army. In November 1659 he undertook an unsuccessful mission to Scotland to arrange terms with George Monck. Edward Whalley was one of the regicides, along with William Goffe (his son-in-law), one of the 76 judges of the High Court of Justice who ruled that Charles I of England was to be executed for the crime of treason and were 2 of the 59 men who actually signed his death warrant in 1649. After Charles II was restored to the throne in 1660, he ordered the arrest of the judges who had condemned his father. Nineteen of the regicides surrendered; others were taken as they attempted to flee. Ten of those caught were beheaded. Edward Whalley and William Goffe fled by ship from Gravesend to Boston, under the names (respectively) of Edward Richardson and William Stephenson, 27 July 1660 on the "Capt. Pierce." They arrived in Boston in July, 1660, and lived in Cambridge their openly under assumed names. In August of that same year, Charles II issued a royal writ for their arrest and execution, the man-of-war bearing these warrants set sail for Boston. Friends of the two regicides found out and secretly chartered a fast sloop by which to send a warning. The sloop over took the King's man-of-war just off Cape Ann, pressed on to Boston Harbor where it arrived too late to reach the city that night. The ship's captain, taking his mission very seriously, manned his small boat with his strongest men and rowed to shore. Governor Endicott was having a party for the two regicides that very evening at the State House. The captain, still dressed in his seaman's clothes, refused to be turned away from the door, arguing his case at length. Governor Endicott overheard the discussion and listened to the captain's message. Realizing that Goffe and Whalley were facing apprehension, the governor ended the reception and sent the two men out of Boston that very night, 26 Feb 1661. They arrived in New Haven, but soon they had to hide there, and they hidden in the "Judge's Cave" by Richard Sperry, and then at Milford. When the King's men started looking for them in CT, in Oct 1664, Whalley and Goffe decided to hide out at the back of beyond, in the small settlement of Hadley. They were taken in by Rev. John Russel, the minister there, and remained concealed there for fifteen or sixteen years. Most say he died between 1674 and 1676, for the last mention of Whalley is 1674. Most say he is buried in the home of John Russel (where bones were found), some say he is buried in New Haven, but this is probably false, and he may have left Hadley and moved down to the Virginia/Maryland area, where there is a family tradition that the Whalley families down there descend from Edward.
(Wikipedia) Parents: Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Edward WHALLEY was born about 1615 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England.1618 He died after 1674 at the age of 59 in Hadley, MA.4644 He was in woollen-draper, major of Cromwell's regiment of horse. 18 Jan 1668 ?
Edward Whalley is said to have started out as a woollen-draper, but on the outbreak of the English Civil War he took up arms for Parliament, became major of Cromwell's regiment of horse, and distinguished himself in the field. His conduct at Gainsborough in 1643 was especially praised by Cromwell; he fought at the Battle of Marston Moor, commanded one of Cromwell's two regiments of cavalry at the Battle of Naseby and at the capture of Bristol, was then sent into Oxfordshire, took Banbury, and was besieging Worcester when he was superseded, according to Richard Baxter, the chaplain of his regiment, because of his religious orthodoxy. The following year, he took part in Cromwell's pursuit of Charles II and took part in the Battle of Worcester. He followed and supported Cromwell in his political career, presented the army petition to parliament (August 1652), approved of the protectorate, and represented Nottinghamshire in the parliaments of 1654 and 1656, taking an active part in the prosecution of the Quaker James Naylor. He was one of the administrative major-generals, responsible for Lincoln, Nottingham, Derby, Warwick and Leicester. He supported the "Petition and Advice," except as regards the proposed assumption of the royal title by Cromwell, and became a member of the newly constituted House of Lords in December 1657. On Cromwell's death, at which he was present, he in vain gave his support to Richard Cromwell; his regiment refused to obey his orders, and the Long Parliament dismissed him from his command as a representative of the army. In November 1659 he undertook an unsuccessful mission to Scotland to arrange terms with George Monck. Edward Whalley was one of the regicides, along with William Goffe (his son-in-law), one of the 76 judges of the High Court of Justice who ruled that Charles I of England was to be executed for the crime of treason and were 2 of the 59 men who actually signed his death warrant in 1649. After Charles II was restored to the throne in 1660, he ordered the arrest of the judges who had condemned his father. Nineteen of the regicides surrendered; others were taken as they attempted to flee. Ten of those caught were beheaded. Edward Whalley and William Goffe fled by ship from Gravesend to Boston, under the names (respectively) of Edward Richardson and William Stephenson, 27 July 1660 on the "Capt. Pierce." They arrived in Boston in July, 1660, and lived in Cambridge their openly under assumed names. In August of that same year, Charles II issued a royal writ for their arrest and execution, the man-of-war bearing these warrants set sail for Boston. Friends of the two regicides found out and secretly chartered a fast sloop by which to send a warning. The sloop over took the King's man-of-war just off Cape Ann, pressed on to Boston Harbor where it arrived too late to reach the city that night. The ship's captain, taking his mission very seriously, manned his small boat with his strongest men and rowed to shore. Governor Endicott was having a party for the two regicides that very evening at the State House. The captain, still dressed in his seaman's clothes, refused to be turned away from the door, arguing his case at length. Governor Endicott overheard the discussion and listened to the captain's message. Realizing that Goffe and Whalley were facing apprehension, the governor ended the reception and sent the two men out of Boston that very night, 26 Feb 1661. They arrived in New Haven, but soon they had to hide there, and they hidden in the "Judge's Cave" by Richard Sperry, and then at Milford. When the King's men started looking for them in CT, in Oct 1664, Whalley and Goffe decided to hide out at the back of beyond, in the small settlement of Hadley. They were taken in by Rev. John Russel, the minister there, and remained concealed there for fifteen or sixteen years. Most say he died between 1674 and 1676, for the last mention of Whalley is 1674. Most say he is buried in the home of John Russel (where bones were found), some say he is buried in New Haven, but this is probably false, and he may have left Hadley and moved down to the Virginia/Maryland area, where there is a family tradition that the Whalley families down there descend from Edward.
(Wikipedia) Parents: *Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Elizabeth WHALLEY was born about 1613 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. Parents: Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Elizabeth WHALLEY was born about 1613 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. Parents: *Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Henry WHALLEY was born about 1617 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. Parents: Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Henry WHALLEY was born about 1617 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. Parents: *Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Margaret WHALLEY was born in 1580 in Radcliffe on Trent, Noddinghamshire, England. She died on 26 November 1634 at the age of 54 in Radcliffe on Trent, Noddinghamshire, England. Parents: Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.

Spouse: Francis HACKER I. Margaret WHALLEY and Francis HACKER I were married on 23 December 1617 in ,Somersetshire,England. Children were: Col Francis HACKER II.


Richard WHALLEY was born in 1570 in Screveton,Kirton,Nottinghamshire,England. Between 1595 and 1596 he was in Sheriff of Nottinghamshire.1618 In 1602 he was in Member of Parliament for Boroughbridge.

or 1585
or in Hinchingbrooke, Huntingdon, England Parents: Thomas WHALEY and Elizabeth HATFIELD.

Spouse: Frances CROMWELL. Frances CROMWELL and Richard WHALLEY were married about 1610 in Hinchbrooke, Huntingtonshire, England. Children were: Margaret WHALLEY, Thomas WHALLEY, *Jane WHALLEY, Elizabeth WHALLEY, Edward WHALLEY, Robert Theophilus WHALLEY, Henry WHALLEY.

Spouse: Annie HORSLEY.

Spouse: Jane STIRAP.


Robert Theophilus WHALLEY was born in 1616 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. He died on 14 February 1720 at the age of 104 in West Greenwich, Kent Co, RI. He was buried in Judge Hopkins Burial Ground. Robert was in Fisherman, weaver, writer, penman, teacher. He was educated in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew scholar. He was in Baptist. 1626
1719
Theophilus came to Virginia before he had reached his majority and served there in a military capacity, but soon returned to England and was an officer in the Parliamentary army. In 1649 his regiment took part in the execution of King Charles I. In 1660 he came again from England to Virginia and married while in Virginia, where part of his children were born. He lived in Farnham Parish, Rappahannock Co, VA. In 1680 he came to Kings Town, R.I., his departure from Virginia being occasioned by a difference in religious views from his neighbors, he being a Baptist. His residence was near the head of Pettaquamscut Pond in what is now South Kingstown. He lived by fishing, weaving and teaching, being conversant with Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, and his services as a penman were brought into requisition in executing the deeds and papers of his neighbors. The visits of distinguished men from Boston and other places, and his silence In regard to his previous history, perhaps account for the persistently held tradition that he was one of the regicide judges and had signed the death warrant of King Charles. Much of mystery still clings to his history notwithstanding the great service done by Rev. Dr. Stiles in his account of this interesting personage. The town record gives but sparse items concerning him, and he seemed to shrink from public office, though he occasionally appears as witness to a will or deed. It has been conjectured that Theophilus Whaley may have been identical with Robert Whaley, a brother of Edward, the Regicide, and that he may have changed his name for some reasons connected with the execution of King Charles. On 30 Jan 1710 he had 120 acres in East Greenwich conveyed to him from the proprietors of the tract of land now comprising West Greenwich. On 20 Feb 1711 he and wife Elizabeth deeded to son Samuel for love, etc., 120 acres in East Greenwich. He moved in he latter part of his life to the house of his son-in-law Joseph Hopkins, situated in what is now West Greenwich. He was buried with military honors on Hopkins Hill. Parents: Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Robert Theophilus WHALLEY was born in 1616 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. He died on 14 February 1720 at the age of 104 in West Greenwich, Kent Co, RI. He was buried in Judge Hopkins Burial Ground. Robert was in Fisherman, weaver, writer, penman, teacher. He was educated in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew scholar. He was in Baptist. 1626
1719
Theophilus came to Virginia before he had reached his majority and served there in a military capacity, but soon returned to England and was an officer in the Parliamentary army. In 1649 his regiment took part in the execution of King Charles I. In 1660 he came again from England to Virginia and married while in Virginia, where part of his children were born. He lived in Farnham Parish, Rappahannock Co, VA. In 1680 he came to Kings Town, R.I., his departure from Virginia being occasioned by a difference in religious views from his neighbors, he being a Baptist. His residence was near the head of Pettaquamscut Pond in what is now South Kingstown. He lived by fishing, weaving and teaching, being conversant with Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, and his services as a penman were brought into requisition in executing the deeds and papers of his neighbors. The visits of distinguished men from Boston and other places, and his silence In regard to his previous history, perhaps account for the persistently held tradition that he was one of the regicide judges and had signed the death warrant of King Charles. Much of mystery still clings to his history notwithstanding the great service done by Rev. Dr. Stiles in his account of this interesting personage. The town record gives but sparse items concerning him, and he seemed to shrink from public office, though he occasionally appears as witness to a will or deed. It has been conjectured that Theophilus Whaley may have been identical with Robert Whaley, a brother of Edward, the Regicide, and that he may have changed his name for some reasons connected with the execution of King Charles. On 30 Jan 1710 he had 120 acres in East Greenwich conveyed to him from the proprietors of the tract of land now comprising West Greenwich. On 20 Feb 1711 he and wife Elizabeth deeded to son Samuel for love, etc., 120 acres in East Greenwich. He moved in he latter part of his life to the house of his son-in-law Joseph Hopkins, situated in what is now West Greenwich. He was buried with military honors on Hopkins Hill. Parents: *Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Thomas WHALLEY was born about 1611 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. On 1 March 1664 he was in Licensed to sell Strong Liquors in Barnstable.4645 Parents: Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Thomas WHALLEY was born about 1611 in Screveton, Nottinghamshire, England. On 1 March 1664 he was in Licensed to sell Strong Liquors in Barnstable.4645 Parents: *Richard WHALLEY and Frances CROMWELL.


Alice WHARTON was born in 1745 in Sefton Parish, Liverpool, Lancashire, England.

Spouse: Lawrence FORMBY. Alice WHARTON and Lawrence FORMBY were married about 1765 in Sefton Parish, Liverpool, Lancashire, England. Children were: Elizabeth FORMBY.


Miss WHARTON448 was born in 1612 in , Charles, Maryland. She has Ancestral File Number GTK9-4V.

Spouse: William DOYNE. Children were: Robert DOYNE, Joshua DOYNE.


Agnes WHATLOCK was born about 1506. She has reference number 9M7S-20.

Spouse: John WHATLOCK. Children were: Thomas WHOTLOCKE.


Anne WHATLOCK[xUpline] (private). Parents: Thomas WHATLOCK and Mrs. Joan WHATLOCK.


Dorothy WHATLOCK was born on 6 July 1572 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, Eng. She was christened on 6 July 1572 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. She was buried on 3 November 1574. Dorothy died on 3 November 1594 at the age of 22 in Suffolk, England. She has reference number 9M7S-0M. Parents: Thomas WHOTLOCKE and Joan WHATLOCK.


Dorothy WHATLOCK was born on 3 November 1574. I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.

I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.

I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.

If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.

When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.

Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.

I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.

If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.

Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.

Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.

The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.

My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families. Parents: Thomas WHATLOCK and Mrs. Joan WHATLOCK.


Dorothy WHATLOCK was born about 1606 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. She died in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. She was christened in Rattlesden, Suffolk, Engl. Dorothy has reference number 8XPP-1F. Parents: Henry SCOTT and Martha WHATLOCK.


Joan WHATLOCK was born in 1539 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. She died on 14 March 1610/1 at the age of 72 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. She was buried on 14 March 1610/1 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. Joan has reference number 9M7R-W5.

Spouse: Thomas WHOTLOCKE. Joan WHATLOCK and Thomas WHOTLOCKE were married in 1608/9 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, Eng. Children were: Roger WHATLOCK, Roger WHATLOCK, Robert WHATLOCK, Robert WHATLOCK, Martha WHATLOCK, Dorothy WHATLOCK.


John WHATLOCK[xUpline] (private).

Spouse: Mrs. Agness WHATLOCK. Children were: Thomas WHATLOCK.


John WHATLOCK was born about 1505. He has reference number 9M7S-1S.

Spouse: Agnes WHATLOCK. Children were: Thomas WHOTLOCKE.


Martha WHATLOCK was born on 18 July 1568 in Rattlesden Suffolk Eng. She was christened on 18 July 1568 in Rattlesden Suffolk England United Kingdom. She died on 14 March 1611 at the age of 42 in Ipswich Essex Massachusetts. I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.

I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.

I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.

If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.

When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.

Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.

I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.

If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.

Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.

Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.

The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.

My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families. Parents: Thomas WHATLOCK and Mrs. Joan WHATLOCK.

Spouse: Henry SCOTT. Martha WHATLOCK and Henry SCOTT were married on 25 July 1594 in Rattlesden Suffolk England. Children were: Thomas SCOTT, Ursula SCOTT, Robert SCOTT, Dorothy Whatlock SCOTT, Roger SCOTT.


Martha WHATLOCK was born on 18 July 1568 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. She was christened on 18 July 1568 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, Eng.. She died in December 1643 at the age of 75 in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts. Martha has reference number B54B-NW. Parents: Thomas WHOTLOCKE and Joan WHATLOCK.

Spouse: Thomas, Sr THOMAS.

Spouse: Henry SCOTT. Martha WHATLOCK and Henry SCOTT were married on 25 July 1594 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. Children were: Thomas SCOTT, Ursula SCOTT, Robert SCOTT, Roger SCOTT, Roger SCOTT, Dorothy WHATLOCK, Dorothy WHATLOCK SCOTT.


Mrs. Agness WHATLOCK[xUpline] (private).

Spouse: John WHATLOCK. Children were: Thomas WHATLOCK.


Mrs. Joan WHATLOCK was born in 1539 in England. She died on 14 March 1610 at the age of 71 in England. She was buried on 14 March 1610 in Rattlesden Suffolk England. I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.

I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.

I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.

If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.

When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.

Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.

I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.

If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.

Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.

Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.

The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.

My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.

Spouse: Thomas WHATLOCK. Mrs. Joan WHATLOCK and Thomas WHATLOCK were married in 1567. Children were: Martha WHATLOCK, Roger WHATLOCK, Robert WHATLOCK, Anne WHATLOCK, Dorothy WHATLOCK.


Mrs. Rachel WHATLOCK was born about 1564 in Barnham,Essex,England. She has reference number NX9Z-B8.

Spouse: Robert WHATLOCK. Mrs. Rachel WHATLOCK and Robert WHATLOCK were married about 1584 in Rattlesden,Sufflok, England.


Robert WHATLOCK was christened on 20 July 1564 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, Eng. She was buried on 28 September 1622. She has reference number P1CG-M4. Parents: Thomas WHOTLOCKE and Joan WHATLOCK.


Robert WHATLOCK was buried on 28 September 1622 in Rattlesden Suffolk England. I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.

I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.

I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.

If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.

When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.

Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.

I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.

If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.

Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.

Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.

The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.

My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families. Parents: Thomas WHATLOCK and Mrs. Joan WHATLOCK.